I
just preached and made many references to the Gospel of John and the theme of
rejection running throughout.
Jesus was the painter who entered His painting and was rejected by all –
and even at the end God Himself.
This brought up the issue I have heard discussed, usually coming from
the politically correct police who only want to distort the Word of God but
here is a brief look at the issue as I see it. Humor me. Is
John’s Gospel anti-Semitic?
Having
studied the issue of an anti-Semitic flavor in John’s Gospel for about an hour
at best it became immediately apparent that this is a rather silly debate. The word ‘Jew’ is used in different
ways depending on the context but never in a negative context when referencing
the people in general. This is
important because John uses negative slurs about the Gentiles in general so it
could more be said that John was anti-gentile but definitely not anti-Jew. Sometimes using the word Jew would
refer to the leadership and in this case the tone could be quite negative. For example in John 7:13 and 9:22 it is
obvious that the term ‘Jews’ is used specifically of the leadership as distinct
from the people:
Yet for fear of the Jews no one spoke
openly of him. (John 7:13)
(His
parents said these things because they feared the Jews, for the Jews had
already agreed that if anyone should confess Jesus to be Christ, he was to be
put out of the synagogue.) (John 9:22)
In other cases ‘Jew’ is used
of the people in general and is at worst used in a neutral way. In John 4:22 we see the positive
connotation about the ‘Jews’ unlikely to be the leadership in this case. In 12:9-11 we see the term ‘Jews’ is
used quite distinct from the chief priests and refers to the people in general:
22 You worship what you do not know; we worship what we
know, for salvation is from the Jews. (John 4:22)
9 When the large crowd of the Jews learned that Jesus
was there, they came, not only on account of him but also to see Lazarus, whom
he had raised from the dead. 10 So the chief priests made plans to put Lazarus to death as well, 11 because on account of him many of the Jews were going
away and believing in Jesus. (John 12:9-11)
All
this said, it still must be mentioned that what constitutes Judaism today is at
best a form of rabbinicism that took off in the tradition of the
Pharisees. Therefore despite the
specificity of John in calling out the leaders, for the most part the tenor of
Jewish rejection still remains a fact of history that simply is. Further, though John puts blame in
general on the leaders, the people ended up putting their loyalty with the
temple rather than Jesus (John 7:13; 9:22). This constitutes a rejection and so we end up back where we
started. John is anti-Semitic and
anti-everybody for he declares the need for all people to be born again to be
saved and so it is really a moot point argued it seems for distraction more
than anything else. As silly as
this debate is, reformers like Martin Luther added fuel to the fire with his
misguided work “On the Jews and Their Lies,”
printed to rail against the ‘Satanic Jews’. He like so many others miss the main point which is that all
people rejected Jesus not just the Jews.
A better work entitled the Satanic everybody would have been more
fitting for Luther. We follow a
rejected crucified Savior who suffered and sacrificed himself for a people who
did not even want Him. He did this
for me before I was even born and I thank God for Jewish rejection because I am
saved by His blood which they in their rejection caused. Paul seems to agree and points out that
it was all to cause all people to be under mercy and grace alone so no one
would ever merit salvation.
Lest you be wise in your own sight, I want
you to understand this mystery, brothers:a partial hardening has come upon
Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. And in this way all
Israel will be saved, as it is written,
“The Deliverer will come from Zion,he will
banish ungodliness from Jacob”; “and this will be my covenant with them
when
I take away their sins.”
As regards the gospel, they are enemies of
God for your sake. But as regards election, they are beloved for the sake of
their forefathers. For the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable. For
just as you were at one time disobedient to God but now have received mercy
because of their disobedience, so they too have now been disobedient in order
that by the mercy shown to you they also may now receive mercy. For God has
consigned all to disobedience, that he may have mercy on all.
Oh, the depth of the riches and wisdom and
knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his
ways! “For who has known the mind of the Lord, or who has been his counselor?”
“Or who has given a gift to him that he might be repaid?” For from him and
through him and to him are all things. To him be glory forever. Amen. (Rom.
11:25-36)
Recent Comments