« Dangerous Success | Main | son of hamas update »

October 24, 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e553d9bb308833013488711c3e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference read the Bible:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Kevin

I choose not to read the bible, because it contradicts modern knowledge and many of its stories are morally appalling. For example the earth was almost certainly not created in 6 days. Modern science contradicts this. This is a fallacy that the bible commits on page 1. There are a myriad of other things that modern knowledge contradicts. There are also many morally horrible passages in the bible. For example here are two appalling cases one of unjustified murder of someone who has not committed a crime and genocide of a group of people. This is morally appalling.
"But if the charge is true and there is no proof that she was a virgin, then they are to take her out to the entrance of her father's house, where the men of her city are to stone her to death. She has done a shameful thing among our people by having intercourse before she was married, while she was still living in her father's house. In this way you will get rid of this evil. "If a man is caught having intercourse with another man's wife, both of them are to be put to death. In this way you will get rid of this evil. "-Deuteronomy 22:20-22

"And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword"

budi tan

i like your article..
very interesting!!

come view my blog too..

matt smith

hey Kevin you make a ton of claims mainly that the Bible is beneath your standard of morality- curious help me out, from whence comes this exalted morality of yours-
further, it is apparent that you have not read the Bible- it is ok to have a beef with it but please let me know what you think the theme of Deuteronomy is since you are quoting it or at least how this passage fits into its context-

finally modern science is not really about history at all and the origin of the earth is conjecture at best- the scientific method is of great benefit with repeatable testable evidence but in terms of history you stretch the realm of science too far to completely reject the Biblical premise-there are a ton of top level scientists the world over that hold to a young earth-check out the book "in six days" not sure the editor but it will give you more to work with than misguided certainty
also you might want to read the Bible-at the very least you can be a bit more coherent with your criticism of it

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment